Skip to main content

The Windows 7 Experience Up to Now

Ah well, I have been running Windows 7 now for a good couple of weeks so thought it may be prudent to breifly share my experiences.

Is it that different to Vista? In terms of how it looks, it is definitely an evolution rather than a revolution. The general look is more or less the same really as are many of the functions such as being able to hit the start key and then filter for the app / file that you want ect.. The control panel is more or less the same as well.

The big obvious difference is the task bar, the programs have now been grouped together underneath icons which can hold several instances of a program (for example a load of Excel workbooks under the Excel logo or a load of IE windows under the IE logo).


I think I really like this feature. I say I think becuase just recently it has been annoying me a little bit. It definitely means you can have lots of different programs open without the desktop and taskbar feeling to crowded, the only thing is it turns some jobs into 2 clicks from 1 click. Now I'm no maths wiz but that means twice as many clicks... Still, overall I do prefer it so I ought not to winge.

Another great feature is the Window snapping. Microsoft have been pushing this tool in the adverts on tv I noticed. If you drag a window to one of the sides of the screen it resizes the window into exactly half the screen. Great if you want to compare 2 documents. This feature doesn't work on the join though when you have 2 screens. I suppose the aurgument is you can compare the documents with 1 screen each.

Just a quick note is that I have 32bit installed at work but have gone for the 64bit at home. I would recommend the 64bit version to anyone on a Core Duo 2 processor. It really is very quick and I have not had any problems with drivers ect.. (then again I don't buy cheap ass peripherals from crappy companies with poor driver support).


One of the things I have really been impressed with and have been having loads of fun is the voice recognition. With time and training this is working out to be a great tool for me. You can use commands such as "Open Internet Explorer" and it will open IE. This also works with any other program. I managed to navigate to the BBC website and then the news and the technology section by just speaking. If you can't get to the bit on the page you want. You can say "show numbers" and you are shown the list of numbers. Simply say one of the numbers and then OK and it will go to that link which is pretty cool you can also use of grid by saying Mouse Grid. You will see a load of numbers and you say the number


where you want to click on the screen. The grid then shrinks to that number until you boil think this is a great feature for people with disabilities especially.

You probably won't believe it but im actually writing this article using voice recognition. It does take some getting used to still and it does get a couple of words wrong but I've managed to write this hold article without much of a problem. Of course it gets mixed up with some of the words. But learns as it goes. I expect great things for this technology in the future!

I mentioned in an earlier blog about home automation and speech recognition and now I have been using this I am very excited about the possibilites. Hoorah!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An instantiated object should be "ok"

I've been QA'ing quite a bit of work recently and one common theme I've noticed across both Java and C# projects I have been looking at is that we occasionally open ourselves up unessacarily to Exceptions by the way objects are being created. My general rule of thumb (which I have seen mentioned in a Pluralsight video recently but also always re-iterate in various Robust Software talks I have done) is that you shouldn't be able to create an object and then call a method or access a property that then throws an exception. At worst, it should return null (I'm not going to moan about that now). I've created an example below. We have two Dojos, one is good and one is bad. The bad dojo looks very familiar though. It's a little class written in the style that seems often encouraged. In fact, many classes start life as something like this. Then as years go on, you and other colleagues add more features to the class and it's instantiation becomes a second

Accessing the UI Thread with Tasks in F#

I have a Windows Forms program written in F# that can deploy a code base to n number of sites at once (you select the sites you would like to deploy to and it goes off and completes a number of tasks (backing up current sites, various unpacking and moving of files etc... ). Once you start it, it begins it's merry journey and begins to update the UI with what has happened. At the moment this method of updating the UI is not pretty because the threads I am doing the work on can't update the UI so I perform some fiendery to make that happen (don't ask). I knew there was a better way using some newer .NET features but I just hadn't got round to having a fiddle yet. I have now found that if you use the built in Task class but break your code up in a nicer way and then chain the tasks together you can then pass the correct context into the task that you want to talk to the UI. Here's a little script to give you a feel for it. You can press the "start" butt

NESTA - Next Gen.

via nesta.org.uk Following on from an article on the BBC about Raspberry Pi, this next gen report has some interesting findings. The scariest stat which I picked out from the BBC website was "out of the 28,767 teachers who were awarded Qualified Teacher Status... in 2010, only three qualified in computing or computing science as their primary qualification" Having worked as a computer science teacher for a year in a school that was a specialist in Computing I can concur that the uptake in Comp Sci was woeful. 2 Students for A2... The other teachers backgrounds in Computer Science was also fairly woeful (most knowing a bit about Office but still a paltry amount even about that). I couldn't speak for my counterpart that I was covering however. I suspect they were fairly up on things. All in all what kills me is that Computer science is not a secondary level subject. Areas are often covered, a little in IT, a little in DT subjects (if kids choose Systems and Contr